Song review

I Will Call Upon The Lord

Michael O'Shields

CCLI #11263Key of D102 BPM4/4
9.3/10
Use freely

A compact, Scripture-saturated declaration of praise built directly on Psalm 18:3 and 2 Samuel 22:4. Its simplicity is its strength: one verse, one chorus, nearly verbatim biblical text, corporate affirmation of God's deliverance. The song's extreme brevity requires intentional use (often as a response, a congregational echo, or a bookend), but within that context it functions powerfully. The call-and-response melody invites participation, the theology is rock-solid, and the lack of original content means zero doctrinal risk. Baptist worship leaders will appreciate its didactic clarity and its accessibility across generations.

Five lenses

01Scriptural fidelity
10.0
No deduction. The song is nearly verbatim Scripture.

The song quotes Psalm 18:3 (and its parallel in 2 Samuel 22:4) almost word-for-word. The only adaptation is the shift from third-person testimony to first-person corporate declaration, which preserves the content while increasing participatory immediacy. This is Scripture song construction at its most faithful: the biblical text shapes not just the theme but the vocabulary, syntax, and theological movement. No paraphrase drift, no content addition, no interpretive overlay.

02Theological clarity
9.5
Minor ambiguity: 'enemies' may need contextual framing in contemporary settings where congregants assume physical adversaries rather than spiritual forces or internal sin.

The song presents a clear theological arc: volitional worship (I will call), the worthiness of God (who is worthy to be praised), and the confident result of divine deliverance (so shall I be saved from my enemies). This mirrors the covenantal logic of the Psalms, where praise and petition intertwine. The repetition reinforces the declarative nature of worship as both testimony and trust. The only nuance requiring pastoral framing is the term 'enemies,' which in Psalm 18 refers to David's literal military foes but in Christian application often represents sin, Satan, and spiritual opposition. Without that framing, younger or less biblically literate congregants may misread the song as triumphalist or politically charged.

03Congregational singability
9.0
The repetitive structure and call-and-response melody are highly accessible, but the octave leap in the chorus (or melodic shape depending on arrangement) can challenge weaker singers if taken too quickly.

The song sits comfortably in the D major congregational sweet spot, with a range of A3 to D5 that accommodates most voices. The melody is simple, memorable, and designed for corporate echo or call-and-response. The moderate tempo (102 BPM) allows for clear articulation and confident singing. The primary singability challenge is not the range but the intervallic leap or sustained high note in the chorus (depending on arrangement), which can tire congregations if repeated extensively without breaks. Most congregations will learn this in one pass and sing it confidently thereafter.

04Poetic and lyrical quality
8.5
The song's lyric is almost entirely Scripture quotation, which means high theological density but minimal poetic development. The repetition serves a didactic and declarative function rather than an artistic one.

The song is not a poet's composition but a liturgist's tool: it takes biblical text and sets it to a singable, memorable form. The imagery is inherited from the Psalm (deliverance from enemies, the Lord as worthy of praise), and the structure is repetitive by design. This is not a flaw; it reflects the song's purpose as a corporate affirmation and a teaching moment. The lack of original lyrical content means the song avoids cliché entirely but also offers no fresh metaphor or contemporary application. It is spare, direct, and unapologetically didactic.

05Defense brief
9.5

This song is nearly criticism-proof because it is Scripture. The most common objections will center not on theology but on function: the song is too short, too repetitive, or too simplistic for liturgical use. These are not flaws but design features. The song was written to teach Scripture, to invite corporate participation, and to create space for declarative worship. Worship leaders can defend this song by framing it as a didactic tool, a congregational catechism set to music, and a low-barrier entry point for visitors and children.

How scores are calculated →

Full analysis

This song is a distilled moment of corporate confidence in God's deliverance, built nearly word-for-word on Psalm 18:3 and its parallel in 2 Samuel 22:4. It takes the psalmist's testimony and transforms it into a congregational vow: 'I will call upon the Lord.' The simplicity is the point. There is no theological elaboration, no narrative arc, no metaphorical development beyond the scriptural source. This is Scripture song construction at its purest, where the melody exists to carry the text into congregational memory. For Baptist worship leaders, this song functions as both worship and catechesis, embedding a key psalm into the congregation's active vocabulary.

The theological clarity is near-absolute because the content is biblical. The only pastoral nuance is the term 'enemies,' which in Psalm 18 refers to David's military adversaries but in Christian application often represents spiritual opposition. Without contextual framing, contemporary congregants may misread the song as triumphalist or politically tinged. A single sentence from the worship leader before the song ('We declare God's victory over sin, Satan, and every spiritual force that opposes His kingdom') resolves this concern and aligns the congregation's interpretive lens with historic Christian reading of the Psalms.

The song's brevity is both its strength and its limitation. At fewer than 30 words, it cannot sustain a full worship set on its own. It works best as a congregational response (perhaps after a testimony or a sermon on deliverance), a call-and-response echo, or a bookend between longer songs. The melody is accessible, the key is congregational, and the repetition invites confident participation even from visitors. The didactic function is clear: this song teaches a scriptural promise and gives the congregation language to declare their trust in God's saving power.

Poetically, the song offers no original content and thus avoids all risk of cliché or theological drift. It is not a lyricist's composition but a liturgist's tool. The repetition is not artistic flourish but pedagogical design, reinforcing the biblical text through corporate rehearsal. The voice is entirely corporate, which is appropriate for a declarative psalm. For worship leaders facing critique about the song's simplicity, the defense is straightforward: this song is Scripture set to music, and its brevity is a feature, not a flaw. It catechizes, it unites, and it points the congregation directly to the biblical text without interpretive mediation.

Defense brief

"The song is too simple and repetitive for a full worship service."
Liturgical

Who raises this: Liturgically trained congregants, those accustomed to hymnic density or contemporary set arcs.

Scripture response

Psalm 136 repeats 'His love endures forever' 26 times. Repetition is a scriptural mode of worship, not a liturgical defect. This song's repetition serves a catechetical function, embedding Scripture in the congregation's memory.

Suggested framing

Frame this song as a congregational echo or a bookend. Use it after a sermon on Psalm 18, as a response to a testimony of deliverance, or as a transitional piece between longer songs. Its brevity is its strength when used intentionally.

Honest concession
The song's brevity does limit its standalone utility. It is not a set centerpiece but a liturgical accent. Worship leaders should plan accordingly.
"The language of 'enemies' feels militaristic or politically charged in a contemporary setting."
Cultural

Who raises this: Congregants sensitive to political rhetoric, pacifist-leaning members, those unfamiliar with Psalmic warfare imagery.

Scripture response

Ephesians 6:12 clarifies that our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces. Psalm 18 uses the language of physical deliverance to testify to God's covenant faithfulness. The church has historically read these texts as referring to spiritual opposition, not political enemies.

Suggested framing

Before singing, briefly contextualize 'enemies' as sin, Satan, and spiritual bondage. A single sentence from the worship leader ('When we sing of enemies, we're declaring God's victory over every force that separates us from Him') resolves most concerns.

Honest concession
The song does not self-interpret. Without framing, the language can be misread in a politically polarized culture. This is not a flaw in the song but a pastoral responsibility.

Scripture map

Primary foundations

Psalm 18:3The song quotes this verse nearly verbatim, taking the psalmist's declaration and transforming it into a corporate vow of worship and trust in God's deliverance.
2 Samuel 22:4The parallel account of David's song of deliverance, with identical wording. The song draws from both textual traditions.

Supporting connections

Psalm 18:1-50The broader context of David's song of deliverance, celebrating God as rock, fortress, and deliverer. The song distills this entire psalm into a single confessional statement.
Ephesians 6:12Provides New Testament lens for understanding 'enemies' as spiritual forces rather than human adversaries, aligning with Christian application of Psalmic warfare language.
Romans 8:31-39Echoes the confidence that if God is for us, no enemy can stand against us. The song's declaration of deliverance resonates with Paul's assurance of God's securing love.

Story behind the song

Michael O'Shields wrote this song in 1981 as part of the Scripture-in-song movement, which sought to set biblical texts directly to accessible melodies for congregational use. The song emerged during a period of renewal in charismatic and evangelical worship, where simplicity and scriptural fidelity were prized.

Worship music historical accounts

The song quickly became a staple in youth groups, summer camps, and contemporary worship services due to its memorability and ease of teaching. Its call-and-response structure made it particularly effective for intergenerational worship.

CCLI usage patterns and worship leader anecdotes

Though less prominent in recent decades as worship music has trended toward longer narrative arcs and more poetic lyricism, the song remains a teaching tool in many Baptist and evangelical contexts, especially for introducing children and new believers to the Psalms.

Contemporary worship trends and church music catalogs

Themes

DeliverancePraiseGod's WorthinessCovenant ConfidenceSpiritual Warfare

Sermon series fit

The PsalmsGod Our DelivererThe Character of GodSpiritual WarfareOld Testament Worship

Audience fit

Maturity

All levels. The simplicity makes it accessible to new believers while the scriptural depth engages mature disciples.

Age group

All ages. Particularly effective with children and youth due to memorability and repetition.

Service type

Contemporary, blended, family worship, camps, youth services.

Visitor-friendly

Highly visitor-friendly. The melody is simple, the lyrics are brief, and the call-and-response structure invites immediate participation.

Special contexts

Excellent for testimony services, deliverance-themed gatherings, or as a congregational response after sermons on God's saving power.

Similar songs

If you love this song

God Is For Us

James Ferguson, James Tealy, Jesse Reeves, Jonny Robinson, Michael Farren, Rich Thompson, Tiarne Tranter

Battle Belongs

Phil Wickham, Brian Johnson

Ancient Of Days

Jesse Reeves, Jonny Robinson, Michael Farren, Rich Thompson

Victory In Jesus

Eugene M. Bartlett

If this concerns you

Great Is Thy Faithfulness

Thomas Obediah Chisholm, William Marion Runyan

Related songs

Battle Belongs

Phil Wickham

9.1

Praise Opens Prison Doors

Chris Tomlin, Jason Ingram, Logan Cain, Madison Cain, Taylor Matz

9.1

Praises (Be Lifted Up)

Josh Baldwin

8.8

You Are My Hiding Place

Michael Ledner

9.2

Mighty Name Of Jesus

Hope Darst, Jacob Sooter, Lauren Sloat

9.1