Song review

More Than Able

Ben Fielding, Chandler Moore, Naomi Raine, Steven Furtick

CCLI #7189991Key of Eb73 BPM4/4
9.2/10
Use freely

A theologically robust celebration of God's power and faithfulness rooted in Genesis 18, with strong congregational appeal. The song balances declarative truth with corporate response, using accessible melody and memorable phrasing. The theological arc moves from recognition of inadequacy through confession of God's ability to confident declaration, making it effective for both teaching and response moments. Minor vocal demands at the ceiling and some repetition keep it from perfection, but this is a strong addition to the contemporary Baptist repertoire.

Five lenses

01Scriptural fidelity
9.8
One subtle shift in emphasis from provision to performance could invite misreading without pastoral framing, though the song consistently returns to God's character

The song is anchored in Genesis 18:14, 'Is anything too hard for the Lord?' appearing as direct quotation in the chorus. This central question drives the entire theological structure. The narrative draws from multiple biblical streams: the inadequacy language echoes Moses ('Who am I?', Exodus 3:11), the waiting-with-hope theme reflects Abraham and Sarah's journey, and the declaration of God's sufficiency connects to Pauline theology of God's power perfected in weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9). The shift from 'I'm not able' to 'You are able' mirrors the biblical pattern of human limitation met by divine capacity seen throughout redemptive history.

02Theological clarity
9.5
The song's declaration of God's ability could be misapplied to prosperity theology without pastoral context, though the lyric itself maintains focus on God's character rather than guaranteed outcomes

The theological arc is well-constructed: acknowledgment of human inability, confession of God's superior power, and corporate declaration of trust. The song maintains orthodox Reformed Baptist theology by centering God's character rather than human faith as the operative agent. The 'more than able' language speaks to God's omnipotence without crossing into name-it-claim-it territory because it remains descriptive of who God is, not prescriptive of what God must do. The bridge's rapid-fire attributes (faithful, able) ground the emotional appeal in doctrinal truth. The structure invites congregational participation in declaring these truths together, reinforcing communal theology.

03Congregational singability
8.7
The F5 ceiling in the original key stretches most congregational altos and many sopranos, and the verse melody requires confident pitch navigation in the mid-range

The song's moderate tempo (73 BPM) and stepwise melody make it accessible once learned, but the vocal demands are real. In the original Eb, the chorus climbs to F5 on 'able,' which will strain untrained voices. Transposing down to D brings the ceiling to E5, more manageable for congregational singing while keeping the verse comfortably in the A3-C4 range for most voices. The melodic contour is memorable - the chorus uses an ascending pattern that naturally builds energy. Rhythmically straightforward with minimal syncopation in the main sections, though the bridge's rapid declarations may require rehearsal for older or less musically confident congregations.

04Poetic and lyrical quality
8.8
Some phrases lean toward contemporary worship convention rather than fresh imagery, and the bridge's list structure sacrifices poetry for theological declaration

The lyric crafts a coherent narrative journey using accessible language. The central conceit - contrasting human inability with divine ability - is simple but effective, avoiding overwrought metaphor. The waiting imagery connects emotionally without manipulation. The bridge shifts from narrative to creedal declaration, trading poetic nuance for theological clarity, which is a defensible choice in corporate worship. The repetition serves liturgical function rather than mere padding, each iteration of 'more than able' reinforcing congregational confidence. The voice is predominantly first-person singular in verses, shifting to direct address in chorus, with corporate implications throughout.

05Defense brief
9.3

The song will face two primary objections: prosperity gospel concerns and emotional manipulation claims. Both can be addressed through careful pastoral framing and recognition of the song's actual theological content. The biblical rooting in Genesis 18 and the focus on God's character rather than guaranteed outcomes provide strong defense. The emotional appeal is honest rather than manipulative, acknowledging real human inadequacy before declaring God's sufficiency. Some may raise questions about the collaborative writing between Elevation and Maverick City given denominational differences, but the theology in this particular song aligns well with Baptist convictions about God's sovereignty and power.

How scores are calculated →

Full analysis

More Than Able anchors itself in one of Scripture's most powerful rhetorical questions: 'Is anything too hard for the Lord?' from Genesis 18:14. This question appears in the narrative where the Lord promises a son to Abraham and Sarah despite their advanced age, and Sarah laughs at the impossibility. God's response is not argument but self-identification - He is the God for whom nothing is too difficult. The song takes this moment and expands it into a corporate declaration, moving from individual acknowledgment of inadequacy through confession of God's superior ability to communal worship. The theological structure is sound: we begin with honest human limitation, encounter God's unlimited power, and respond with trust and praise.

The song's greatest strength is its ability to hold together emotional honesty and theological precision. The verse's 'I'm not able' language resonates with genuine human experience - we face situations beyond our capacity, we wait for answers that don't come on our timeline, we reach the end of our resources. This is not therapeutic self-pity but biblical realism, echoing Moses' protest at the burning bush and Paul's acknowledgment of his thorn in the flesh. The chorus responds not with human bootstrapping but with declaration of God's character: 'You are able.' This shift from first-person inadequacy to second-person declaration of divine sufficiency mirrors the biblical pattern of lament meeting sovereignty, human weakness encountering divine strength.

The congregational singability requires some attention. In the original key of Eb, the chorus's peak on 'able' reaches F5, which will strain many untrained voices in a typical Baptist congregation. Transposing down to D brings the ceiling to E5, more accessible while keeping the verse comfortably singable. The melody itself is well-crafted for congregational use - stepwise motion in the verses, a memorable ascending pattern in the chorus, and rhythmic simplicity throughout most of the song. The bridge introduces faster lyric density with its rapid attribute declarations, but these use familiar melodic motifs that congregations can pick up after several repetitions. With confident platform leadership and the key adjustment, most congregations will be singing strongly by the second full run-through.

Pastorally, this song requires framing to prevent misapplication. The declaration that God is 'able' must be understood as statement of God's character and power, not as guarantee that God will fulfill our specific requests or solve our problems on our preferred timeline. The Genesis 18 context helps here - God was indeed able to give Abraham and Sarah a son, and He did, but in His timing and according to His purposes, not human demand. When introducing the song, clarify that we're declaring who God is (omnipotent, faithful, sovereign) rather than dictating what God must do (heal this person, resolve this situation, answer this prayer in this way). With that pastoral guardrail in place, the song becomes a powerful tool for building congregational confidence in God's character during seasons of waiting, limitation, and dependency. It teaches sound theology: our inability meets God's ability, and we respond with worship.

Defense brief

"This song promotes prosperity gospel theology by declaring that God is 'able' to do anything we ask"
Theological

Who raises this: Theologically conservative members concerned about Word of Faith influences in contemporary worship

Scripture response

Genesis 18:14 itself is God's rhetorical question about His own power in response to Sarah's doubt, not a blank-check promise. The song declares God's ability as an attribute of His character, not as a guarantee that He will fulfill our specific requests. The biblical pattern shows God is able but sovereign - able to deliver Daniel's friends from the furnace, but not obligated to do so (Daniel 3:17-18). The song's focus on 'You are able' rather than 'You will do what I ask' maintains this distinction.

Suggested framing

Before singing, clarify: 'This song reminds us that nothing is too hard for the Lord - not that God must do everything we want, but that He has the power and wisdom to accomplish His good purposes. We're declaring who God is, not dictating what God must do.'

Honest concession
Without pastoral framing, a congregant steeped in prosperity teaching could misapply this song. The responsibility is on leadership to teach the distinction between God's ability and God's obligation before introducing the song.
"The song is emotionally manipulative, using repetition and building music to manufacture feelings rather than engage the mind"
Liturgical

Who raises this: Traditional/liturgical members who prefer hymnic structure and doctrinal density

Scripture response

The Psalms themselves use repetition for liturgical and emotional effect (Psalm 136's repeated 'His love endures forever,' Psalm 150's escalating calls to praise). Repetition in worship serves memory, corporate participation, and meditative focus. The emotional engagement is directed toward a biblical truth (God's power) with explicit scriptural warrant (Genesis 18:14), not free-floating sentiment.

Suggested framing

Explain the liturgical function: 'We're going to declare this truth multiple times together because repetition in worship isn't about working up feelings - it's about letting a biblical truth sink deep. The ancient Israelites sang refrains; we're doing the same with this Genesis 18 declaration.'

Honest concession
The song does build emotionally through repetition and musical dynamics. This is by design and reflects a Pentecostal/charismatic worship aesthetic that may feel foreign to traditional Baptists. Leaders should know their congregation's tolerance for extended musical moments.
"The Elevation/Maverick City collaboration raises concerns about theological alignment given Steven Furtick's controversial statements and Maverick City's charismatic expressions"
Cultural

Who raises this: Denominationally aware members who track worship song origins and pastoral theology

Scripture response

Baptist conviction allows us to eat the meat and spit out the bones - to evaluate each song on its own theological merit regardless of source. Paul used pagan poetry when it served truth (Acts 17:28). This particular song's theology is sound: God's omnipotence, human limitation, scriptural grounding. We need not endorse every aspect of a writer's ministry to use a theologically faithful song.

Suggested framing

'We choose songs based on biblical fidelity and congregational edification, not based on whether we agree with every theological position of every writer. This song's focus on God's power from Genesis 18 serves our worship well, and we're grateful for that contribution to the wider church's song collection.'

Honest concession
If your congregation has strong concerns about Furtick or charismatic worship, introducing this song may require more pastoral capital than it's worth, even though the song itself is theologically sound. Know your context and decide whether this battle serves your people.

Scripture map

Primary foundations

Genesis 18:14Direct quotation of God's rhetorical question to Sarah, forming the theological and lyrical foundation of the entire song
2 Corinthians 12:9-10The contrast between human weakness and divine strength, God's power perfected in inadequacy, supporting the 'I'm not able, You are able' structure

Supporting connections

Exodus 3:11Moses' 'Who am I?' protest echoes in the song's acknowledgment of personal inadequacy before divine calling
Jeremiah 32:17Jeremiah's prayer, 'Nothing is too hard for you,' echoes the Genesis question and supports the song's central declaration
Luke 1:37Gabriel's announcement to Mary, 'Nothing will be impossible with God,' connects the Genesis promise to New Testament fulfillment
Daniel 3:17-18The friends' declaration that God is able to deliver but may not choose to do so provides important theological nuance for the song's claims
Ephesians 3:20God's ability to do immeasurably more than we ask or imagine supports the 'more than able' intensification

Story behind the song

More Than Able emerged from a collaborative writing session between Elevation Worship and Maverick City Music in 2022, part of an intentional effort to blend different worship traditions and voices. The song was written by Ben Fielding (known for 'What a Beautiful Name'), Chandler Moore and Naomi Raine from Maverick City, and Steven Furtick, lead pastor of Elevation Church.

Album credits and collaborative session documentation

The song was released on Maverick City Music Vol. 3 Part 2 and quickly became a congregational favorite, resonating particularly during the post-pandemic season when many churches were processing delayed answers to prayer and ongoing uncertainty. The Genesis 18 focus on God's power in impossible situations spoke directly to congregational experience.

Release context and worship leader feedback

The collaboration between Elevation and Maverick City represented a bridging of predominantly white evangelical and Black gospel worship streams, bringing together different musical aesthetics and worship expressions around shared theological convictions about God's power and faithfulness. The song's accessibility has made it useful across diverse congregational contexts.

Contemporary worship music analysis

Themes

God's PowerGod's FaithfulnessDivine ProvidenceTrustWaiting on GodHuman LimitationGod's Sufficiency

Sermon series fit

Faith in Difficult SeasonsThe Character of GodTrusting God's TimingThe God of AbrahamWhen God Seems SilentPower Perfected in WeaknessOld Testament Promises

Audience fit

Maturity

Accessible to newer believers with its clear God-focused declarations, while offering theological depth for mature saints through the Genesis 18 grounding and the contrast between human and divine ability

Age group

Strong intergenerational appeal - simple enough for youth, contemporary enough for young adults, theologically substantive enough for older adults who value biblical content

Service type

Works well in both contemporary and blended services; the moderate tempo and clear melody allow for congregational participation without requiring concert-level musicianship

Visitor-friendly

Highly visitor-friendly - the central message is immediately clear, the melody is memorable after one hearing, and the biblical reference provides accessible grounding even for the unchurched

Special contexts

Particularly effective during congregational seasons of waiting (building projects, pastoral transitions, community challenges), times when people are facing personal impossibilities, or when teaching on God's faithfulness and power

Similar songs

Related songs

The Plans

Andrew Bergthold, Ed Cash, Franni Cash, Martin Cash, Scott Cash

9.1

My Soul Will Wait (Psalm 62)

Bob Kauflin, Keaton Bunting

9.3

Never Lost

Chris Brown, Steven Furtick, Tiffany Hudson

9.3

Don't Stop Praying

Jeff Pardo, Matthew West

8.8

Man Of Your Word

Chandler Moore, Jonathan Jay, Nathan Jess, Tony Brown

9.3