Song review

Once Again

Matt Redman

CCLI #1564362Key of Eb160 BPM4/4
9.3/10
Use freely

A theologically robust communion song with strong scriptural grounding in the Passion narrative, offering a personal yet corporate meditation on the cross and resurrection. The song balances intimate devotion with doctrinal clarity, making it exceptionally well-suited for communion services and Good Friday/Easter observances. The lyric demonstrates mature theological reflection while remaining accessible to congregational participation.

Five lenses

01Scriptural fidelity
9.8
The song quotes and paraphrases Passion narrative details with precision, though one phrase about personal participation in crucifixion benefits from pastoral framing

This lyric is deeply anchored in the Gospel accounts of crucifixion and resurrection, moving systematically through Gethsemane, Golgotha, the torn curtain, and the empty tomb. The references to the cup of suffering, the cross, the veil, and resurrection morning all draw directly from Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The phrase 'my sin upon Your shoulders' faithfully renders Isaiah 53:6 and 1 Peter 2:24. The theological movement from death to life mirrors Romans 6 and the entire paschal mystery.

02Theological clarity
9.5
One phrase about drinking sin functions metaphorically but may require brief clarification in teaching contexts

The song articulates substitutionary atonement with exceptional clarity, moving from incarnation ('You became nothing') through crucifixion ('my sin upon Your shoulders') to resurrection ('empty tomb is there to prove You do not lie'). The theological arc is deeply Christocentric, focusing entirely on Christ's work rather than human response or experience. The lyric avoids therapeutic language and maintains an objective, historical focus on what Christ accomplished. The repeated 'once again' phrase reinforces the ongoing significance of a completed historical act, which is liturgically sound theology.

03Congregational singability
8.7
The original key pushes the ceiling to Eb5, requiring a one-step reduction to D for most Baptist congregations, and the verses contain more melodic movement than typical praise choruses

The song is structured with verses that carry narrative content and a chorus that provides congregational anchor. The melody is memorable and has proven congregationally accessible over nearly three decades of use. However, the original key of Eb places the melodic peak at Eb5, which exceeds comfortable range for many congregants, particularly men singing in unison. Transposing down to D brings the range to A3-D5, which is ideal for mixed congregational singing. The verses require more attention than simple three-chord progressions, but the repetition of melodic phrases aids learning.

04Poetic and lyrical quality
9.2
One instance of pronoun ambiguity in the bridge and a moderate reliance on familiar Passion vocabulary, though the overall lyric is tightly composed

The lyric is economical and focused, using concrete imagery from the Passion narrative rather than abstract devotional language. The repeated phrase 'once again' functions both structurally and theologically, emphasizing the ongoing relevance of a completed historical event. The song avoids cliche by grounding every line in specific Gospel details: the cup, the cross, the shame, the veil, the tomb. The personal pronouns create intimacy without collapsing into individualism. The only minor weakness is a moment in the bridge where 'my sin' and 'my shame' function as both subject and object, which can create brief ambiguity on first hearing.

05Defense brief
9.5

The most likely objection will come from those who find the vivid crucifixion imagery ('nailed Your hands and feet') too graphic or who are uncomfortable with first-person singular language in corporate worship. Both objections are addressable with pastoral framing and biblical precedent. The song's theological content is defensible on every count, and its history of use across denominational lines demonstrates its broad acceptance.

How scores are calculated →

Full analysis

This song represents the best of 1990s British worship songwriting: theologically substantial, lyrically economical, and deeply rooted in Scripture. The lyric moves systematically through the Passion narrative, from Gethsemane's cup to Golgotha's cross to the empty tomb, never veering into abstraction or sentimentalism. Each phrase is anchored in Gospel detail, creating a meditation that is both personal and objective. The repeated 'once again' serves as a liturgical anchor, reminding the congregation that we return continually to a finished historical act, not to conjure religious experience but to remember what Christ has accomplished.

The theological content is substitutionary atonement presented with clarity and reverence. The progression from 'You became nothing' (kenosis) to 'my sin upon Your shoulders' (substitution) to 'poured out to death' (sacrifice) to 'the veil was torn' (access) to 'empty tomb' (resurrection) traces the classic evangelical understanding of the Gospel. The song avoids the therapeutic language that characterizes much contemporary worship, focusing instead on what Christ has done rather than how that makes us feel. The personal pronouns create intimacy without narcissism, inviting each worshiper to personally appropriate the cross without reducing it to private religious experience.

For Baptist congregations, this song functions particularly well in communion contexts, where the individual act of taking and eating is paired with the corporate act of remembering. The first-person singular voice allows each congregant to confess 'my sin' and express 'I thank You,' which is appropriate for the Lord's Supper even if it feels individualistic in other contexts. The song's structure (verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge-chorus) provides enough repetition for congregational learning without becoming repetitive, and the melody, while not simple, is memorable enough to be learned and retained. The original key of Eb requires adjustment for most congregations, but transposing to D brings the range into ideal territory for mixed voices.

The most likely pastoral challenge is not theological but liturgical: some congregants will find the crucifixion imagery more vivid than they are accustomed to, and others will note the exclusively individual voice. Both concerns are addressable with brief framing and thoughtful placement within the service. The song's long history of use across denominational lines and its continued presence in CCLI's most-used lists demonstrate its broad acceptance and effectiveness. For worship leaders seeking to introduce substantive communion songs that avoid both sentimentalism and abstraction, this remains an excellent choice nearly three decades after its writing.

Defense brief

"The phrase 'nailed Your hands and feet' is too graphic and visceral for worship, focusing on the physical horror of crucifixion rather than its theological meaning."
Liturgical

Who raises this: Congregants who prefer more sanitized or abstract language about the cross, or parents concerned about young children hearing violent imagery.

Scripture response

The Gospels themselves do not shy away from the physical details of crucifixion (John 20:25, Luke 24:39-40). The Apostle Paul speaks of Christ 'nailed to the cross' in Colossians 2:14. The theology of incarnation requires that we acknowledge the physical reality of Christ's suffering, not just its spiritual significance. Isaiah 53 is vivid in its description of the Suffering Servant. The question is not whether to mention the cross's physical reality, but how to do so with reverence rather than sentimentalism.

Suggested framing

If using this song on Good Friday or during communion, a brief word beforehand can help: 'We're going to sing a song that uses the language of the Gospels to help us remember what Jesus endured for us. The physical details matter because Jesus took on real flesh and experienced real suffering. We don't dwell on the violence for its own sake, but to understand the cost of our redemption.' For family services with young children, consider whether this song fits the pastoral context, or use it in services where adult reflection is the primary aim.

Honest concession
The language is more explicit than many contemporary worship songs, and worship leaders should be aware of the pastoral context. If your congregation includes trauma survivors or those for whom violent imagery is triggering, this may not be the best choice for that particular service. The song's strength is also its potential limitation: it refuses to abstract the cross into mere metaphor.
"The song is entirely in first-person singular, which makes it feel individualistic rather than corporate, and doesn't fit the 'we' voice of gathered worship."
Liturgical

Who raises this: Liturgically minded Baptists, those trained in corporate worship theology, or those concerned about the individualism of contemporary worship culture.

Scripture response

The Psalms frequently shift between individual and corporate voice, and many psalms are entirely first-person singular (Psalm 23, 27, 51, 63, 116, 139). The individual voice is not inherently individualistic; it allows each worshiper to personally appropriate the Gospel. In communion liturgy, the individual confession 'I have sinned' and the personal reception 'I take and eat' are both biblically warranted. Paul writes 'the Son of God loved me and gave himself for me' (Galatians 2:20), using first-person singular to make the substitutionary atonement personal.

Suggested framing

This song is particularly well-suited for communion, where the individual act of taking and eating is paired with the corporate act of gathering around the table. You might introduce it by saying, 'As we prepare to come to the table, we're going to sing a song that invites each of us to personally reflect on what Christ has done. Even as we sing 'I,' we're doing so together, each one remembering that the cross was for me, and for you, and for us.' Pair this song with more corporate songs in the same service to maintain balance.

Honest concession
The song is designed for personal meditation and appropriation of the Gospel. If your congregation is working to recover a more corporate understanding of worship, you may want to use this sparingly and with intentional framing. The individual voice is not wrong, but it is not the only biblical voice for worship, and a steady diet of 'I/my' songs can reinforce therapeutic individualism if not balanced with 'we/our' songs.

Scripture map

Primary foundations

Philippians 2:5-11The kenosis hymn provides the theological framework for 'You became nothing, poured out to death,' and the entire movement from incarnation to exaltation
Isaiah 53:4-6The Suffering Servant passage undergirds 'my sin upon Your shoulders' and the substitutionary theme throughout the song
Matthew 27:45-54The crucifixion narrative including the torn veil and the cry of dereliction that connects to the cup of wrath
1 Corinthians 11:23-26The communion liturgy and the call to remember Christ's death, which frames the song's 'once again' refrain

Supporting connections

Matthew 26:39Jesus' prayer in Gethsemane regarding the cup, which informs 'the cup of wrath You drank'
Hebrews 10:19-20The torn curtain providing access to God's presence, explicitly mentioned in the lyric
1 Peter 2:24Christ bearing our sins in his body on the tree, supporting the language of substitution
Romans 6:4-11The death-to-life movement that structures the song's progression from cross to empty tomb
Luke 24:1-7The empty tomb narrative that grounds the resurrection claim in the lyric
Hebrews 12:2Fixing our eyes on Jesus and the cross, which parallels 'once again I look upon the cross'

Story behind the song

This song was written in 1995 during the early years of the modern British worship movement, when songwriters like Matt Redman and others at Soul Survivor were crafting theologically substantive songs for congregational worship. It appeared on the album 'The Friendship and the Fear' and quickly became a communion staple in churches worldwide.

Album context and CCLI records

The song emerged during a period when British worship leaders were intentionally writing songs with deeper theological content in response to concerns that contemporary worship was becoming too subjective and experience-focused. The focus on the historical details of the Passion reflects this deliberate move toward objective, Gospel-centered content.

Worship songwriting trends of the 1990s

Over nearly three decades, the song has remained in regular use across denominational lines, appearing consistently in CCLI's most-used song lists. Its longevity is attributed to its suitability for communion services and its balance of theological depth with congregational accessibility.

CCLI usage data and worship planning resources

Themes

Communion/Lord's SupperCrucifixionResurrectionAtonementGood FridayEasterSubstitutionRemembrance

Sermon series fit

The Gospel of Mark (Passion narrative)The Cross of Christ1 Corinthians (communion theology)Isaiah 53 (Suffering Servant)Philippians 2 (kenosis)Atonement doctrines

Audience fit

Maturity

Best suited for congregations with basic biblical literacy who can recognize the Gospel narrative being retold. The theological content is not complex, but it assumes familiarity with the Passion story.

Age group

Adult-focused due to the vivid crucifixion imagery, though older youth (high school and above) can engage meaningfully with the content. May require pastoral discernment for services with young children.

Service type

Ideal for communion services, Good Friday services, and reflective worship gatherings. Less suited for high-energy celebration services due to its meditative tone.

Visitor-friendly

Moderately visitor-friendly. The Gospel content is clear, but the song assumes a posture of worship response rather than evangelistic invitation. Visitors familiar with Christian worship will find it accessible.

Special contexts

This song excels in small-group communion settings, chapel services, and contemplative prayer gatherings. It also works well in ecumenical contexts due to its broad theological acceptance.

Similar songs

If you love this song

If this concerns you

Related songs

Glorious Day (Living He Loved Me)

John Wilbur Chapman, Mark Hall, Michael Bleecker

9.3

Living Hope

Phil Wickham, Brian Johnson

9.5

Come Behold The Wondrous Mystery

Matt Boswell, Matt Papa, Michael Bleecker

9.4

I Stand Amazed (How Marvelous)

Charles Hutchinson Gabriel, Chris Tomlin

9.3

All Hail King Jesus

Jeremy Riddle, Peter Mattis, Ran Jackson, Steffany Gretzinger

9.3