Song review

This Is Our God

Phil Wickham, Steven Furtick, Brandon Lake, Pat Barrett

CCLI #7211413Key of C80 BPM4/4
9.2/10
Use freely

A theologically robust testimony song that functions as corporate creedal declaration. The bridge's conversational call-and-response creates memorable congregational energy while maintaining biblical grounding in Psalm 40. The chorus balances identity declaration with gospel action in a way that feels both confessional and doxological.

Five lenses

01Scriptural fidelity
9.5
One phrase uses metaphorical language that requires contextual understanding but never departs from biblical imagery

The song draws directly from Psalm 40:2 in its bridge structure and weaves together multiple biblical themes: deliverance from sin (Colossians 1:13-14), Christ's substitutionary work (Isaiah 53:4-6), and resurrection victory (1 Corinthians 15:55-57). The opening metaphor of sin and shame as prisons echoes Pauline theology without direct quotation, while the chorus functions as both testimony and theological assertion grounded in Scripture's narrative of redemption.

02Theological clarity
9.3
The chorus balances character and action beautifully but could imply that loving and saving are sequential rather than unified expressions of God's nature

The theological arc moves from corporate memory of bondage, through testimony of deliverance, to creedal declaration of God's character and saving work. The chorus structure 'this is who He is... this is what He does' distinguishes being from action in pedagogically helpful ways while avoiding ontological separation. The bridge's call-and-response reinforces personal testimony within corporate confession, maintaining both individual rescue and collective identity.

03Congregational singability
8.7
The D5 in the ending section stretches average congregational range, though the majority of the song sits comfortably mid-voice

The verse melody uses stepwise motion and comfortable mid-range phrasing. The chorus elevates for emotional lift without extreme jumps. The bridge's call-and-response structure is intuitive and creates natural congregational participation. Primary singability challenge is the ending's upward reach, which can be modified by dropping to harmony or lowering the key to B♭ for congregations with limited upper range.

04Poetic and lyrical quality
8.8
The chorus uses direct declaration over metaphor, prioritizing clarity and memorability over poetic complexity

The song employs effective testimony structure with vivid opening imagery of walls and prisons. The chorus trades poetic subtlety for theological directness, functioning as creedal statement rather than artistic meditation. The bridge's conversational rhythm creates engaging participation. The 19% repetition ratio indicates balanced structure without excessive cycling. Pronoun shifts between 'we,' 'our,' and 'me' reflect the Psalmic convention of moving between corporate and individual testimony naturally.

Congregational voice distribution
Individual
8%
Corporate
92%

Primarily corporate in voice. No congregational concern.

05Defense brief
9.0

This song will face minimal theological objection from Baptist congregations. Its primary vulnerability is stylistic rather than doctrinal: the conversational bridge and direct chorus may feel too casual for high-liturgy preferences. The multi-artist collaboration could raise questions about theological consistency across contributing voices, though the final product maintains clear orthodoxy. Grammatically and theologically, it stands on solid ground.

How scores are calculated →

Full analysis

This song functions as corporate testimony shaped into creedal declaration, moving naturally from past bondage to present proclamation. The opening verse uses prison imagery to establish the universal human condition apart from Christ, grounding the testimony in shared experience rather than individual exceptionalism. This creates space for every believer to enter the narrative. The metaphor of walls as sin and shame resonates with Pauline language of enslavement to sin in Romans 6, while the escape language anticipates the deliverance testimony that follows. The structure invites congregations to remember corporately before declaring collectively.

The chorus balances theological precision with accessible language, distinguishing God's character ('who He is') from His actions ('what He does') without divorcing them. This pedagogical move helps congregations understand that God's saving work flows from His loving nature—He saves us because He loves us, not to earn our affection. The repetition of 'this is our God' functions as both identity marker and invitation, claiming covenant relationship while proclaiming objective truth. It avoids the therapeutic tendency to make worship primarily about our experience, instead anchoring our testimony in God's revealed character.

The bridge's call-and-response structure draws directly from Psalm 40:2, where David testifies, 'He drew me up from the pit of destruction, out of the miry bog.' The question format ('Who pulled me out of that pit?') followed by corporate answer ('He did, He did') creates memorable participation while reinforcing individual application within corporate singing. This structure allows each person to claim the testimony personally while simultaneously making a collective declaration. The repetitive affirmation 'He did' builds confidence and congregational energy, functioning as both catechesis and celebration. For Baptist congregations that value personal testimony, this bridge offers a liturgically appropriate way to express individual deliverance within gathered worship.

The song's theological arc—from bondage through deliverance to proclamation—mirrors the gospel narrative and provides a complete testimony structure. The ending's summary of Christ's work ('bore the cross, beat the grave') uses active, visceral verbs that avoid sanitizing the Passion while remaining accessible for congregational singing. The phrase 'let heaven and earth proclaim' broadens the scope from personal testimony to cosmic witness, connecting individual rescue to the larger story of redemption. For worship leaders, this song offers a rare combination: clear gospel content, memorable structure, accessible melody, and theological substance. It serves equally well as a response to Scripture reading, a communion meditation, or a testimony-focused gathering song. The primary caution is ensuring congregations understand the covenant language of 'our God' as response to divine self-revelation rather than presumptuous claiming.

Defense brief

"The phrase 'this is our God' could be perceived as possessive or tribal rather than confessional, implying ownership of God rather than covenant relationship."
Theological

Who raises this: Theologically careful members concerned about proper God-language

Scripture response

The phrase echoes Isaiah 25:9, 'Behold, this is our God; we have waited for him,' and Exodus 15:2, 'The LORD is my strength and my song, and he has become my salvation; this is my God.' The possessive language in Scripture reflects covenant relationship, not ownership—God has made Himself known to His people and identified with them.

Suggested framing

Introduce the song as testimony and creed combined: 'We're declaring together what God has done and who He has revealed Himself to be. This is covenant language—He is ours because He has claimed us as His own.'

Honest concession
The phrase does require context. Without scriptural grounding, it could feel presumptuous. Worship leaders should frame it clearly as response to God's self-revelation rather than human claiming.
"The bridge's call-and-response format ('Who pulled me out?' 'He did') feels too casual or performance-oriented for reverent worship, more like a concert moment than liturgy."
Liturgical

Who raises this: Liturgically traditional members, older congregants accustomed to formal worship language

Scripture response

The Psalms are filled with questions posed and answered within the same text (Psalm 24:8-10, 'Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and mighty'). Antiphonal worship—where congregation responds to cantor or leader—has deep roots in Hebrew worship and early church practice. The conversational tone reflects testimony language found throughout Acts and the Epistles.

Suggested framing

Frame the bridge as testimony in the biblical sense: 'The psalmists often asked questions and answered them. This is how we rehearse what God has done—by asking the question and declaring the answer together.'

Honest concession
The bridge does shift the song's register toward contemporary testimony style. For congregations unfamiliar with call-and-response, it may require explanation or feel performative initially. It works best in contexts where participatory worship is already established.
"The song involves multiple artists from different worship movements (Bethel, Elevation, Calvary Chapel), which may raise concern about theological consistency or blended influences."
Cultural

Who raises this: Members cautious about continuationist influences or megachurch worship trends

Scripture response

The final song text must be evaluated on its own theological content, not the backgrounds of contributors. Colossians 3:16 calls us to 'teach and admonish one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs.' If the lyric is biblically sound, the collaboration model is irrelevant to its usability.

Suggested framing

Address this preemptively only if your congregation has demonstrated concern about worship sources: 'We evaluate songs by their biblical content, not by their origin. This song clearly proclaims the gospel: Christ's work on the cross and our deliverance from sin.'

Honest concession
Baptist churches with specific concerns about charismatic theology should know the artist backgrounds, but this particular song contains no continuationist distinctives, prophetic language, or theological ambiguity. It is functionally indistinguishable from traditional evangelical testimony songs.

Scripture map

Primary foundations

Psalm 40:1-3Direct source for the pit deliverance testimony in the bridge. David's language of being lifted from the miry bog provides the conceptual frame for the song's rescue narrative.
Isaiah 25:9The phrase 'this is our God' echoes Isaiah's proclamation at the eschatological feast, where God's people declare His identity after experiencing salvation.
Colossians 1:13-14Paul's description of deliverance from the domain of darkness into the kingdom of the Son parallels the song's prison-to-freedom imagery.
1 Corinthians 15:54-57The ending's reference to beating the grave connects to Paul's resurrection victory language: 'Death is swallowed up in victory.'

Supporting connections

Romans 6:17-18The verse's prison metaphor reflects Paul's language of slavery to sin from which believers have been set free.
Isaiah 53:4-6The line about bearing the cross draws on Isaiah's suffering servant prophecy and its fulfillment in Christ's substitutionary atonement.
Ephesians 2:4-5The chorus emphasis on God's love as the source of salvation mirrors Paul's 'But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us.'
Psalm 24:8-10The bridge's question-and-answer format parallels the antiphonal structure of this enthronement psalm.

Themes

DeliveranceTestimonyGod's CharacterSalvationGospelSin and RedemptionResurrection

Sermon series fit

Psalms (especially Psalm 40)Romans (sin and deliverance themes)Easter/Resurrection seriesPersonal testimony emphasisAtonement theologyIdentity in Christ

Audience fit

Maturity

All levels—accessible to new believers while theologically substantial for mature disciples

Age group

Cross-generational—simple enough for youth, substantive enough for adults

Service type

Sunday morning worship, evening testimony services, baptism celebrations, youth gatherings

Visitor-friendly

High—clear gospel content, memorable structure, accessible language

Special contexts

Particularly effective for baptism services, testimony emphasis Sundays, or as response to salvation-themed preaching

Similar songs

If you love this song

Graves Into Gardens

There Was Jesus

If this concerns you

Yet Not I But Through Christ In Me

Related songs

Back To Life

Ben Fielding, Brian Johnson, Chris Davenport, Phil Wickham, Reuben Morgan, Zahriya Zachary

9.3

What A Miracle

Jonathan Smith, Leeland Mooring, Pat Barrett, Steven Furtick

9.3

Graves Into Gardens

Brandon Lake, Chris Brown, Steven Furtick, Tiffany Hudson

9.2

Egypt

Cory Asbury, Phil Wickham, Ethan Hulse, Brian Johnson, Lee Cummings

9.2

Your Love Awakens Me

Chris Quilala, Phil Wickham

9.2